SURESH KUMAR KAIT, P.KESHAVA RAO
D. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
S. Padmavathi – Respondent
P. KESHAVA RAO, J.
1. Heard the counsel for the appellant as well as the respondents.
2. The present appeal is filed by the appellant who is the petitioner in the Court below aggrieved by the orders passed in O.P.No.658 of 2006 dated 8.09.2011 on the file of the Court of Family Judge, Visakhapatnam in dismissing the petition filed under Section 7(1)(e) of the Family Court Act to declare the appellant herein as the legally wedded wife of one late D.Govinda Rao and for consequential relief that she is entitled to receive pension, family pension and medical benefits and all other emoluments payable by second respondent and first respondent is not entitled to any amounts.
3. Originally the appellant herein filed the above said petition to declare that she is the legally wedded wife of late Govinda Rao whose marriage was performed on 10.05.1985 according to the Hindu Customs and Rights at Visakhapatnam. They had no children. Late D. Govinda Rao was employed as Junior Engineer in the second respondent-Railway Department. Late D. Govinda Rao was a chronic diabetic patient, his leg was amputated below the knee and retired on medical grounds, on 11.11.2000. He executed all necessary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.