SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(AP) 7

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Govindu Vidyulatha – Appellant
Versus
Movva Suri Babu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Jyothi Prasad.
For the Respondents: V.S.R. Anjaneyalu.

JUDGMENT :

D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU, J.

1. This revision petition is filed questioning the order dated 11-12-2017 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada in EA. No. 378 of 2017 in EP. No. 83 of 2014 in OS. No. 1009 of 2011.

2. The application EA. No. 378 of 2017 is filed to condone the delay of 920 days in filing the application to set aside the ex parte order. The application is contested and the impugned order came to be passed by which the Court dismissed the application. Questioning the same, the present revision has been filed.

3. This Court has heard Sri K. Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner argued that the revision petitioner is a widow and that the suit is filed for recovery of a debt allegedly due by her husband. According to the learned counsel, against the judgment and decree, which is passed in the suit on 20-03-2014, a first appeal has been filed bearing SR. No. 290 of 2018 along with an application to condone the delay. Learned counsel submits that the enquiry in the application filed to condone the delay in filing the appeal















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top