SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(AP) 23

C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Ahamed Riswan – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. Vijaysen Reddy

JUDGMENT :

C. Praveen Kumar, J.

1. The present writ petition came to be filed seeking issuance of writ of habeas corpus, directing the respondents to produce A.T. Maideen (hereinafter called 'detenue') before this Court and set him at liberty as his continued incarceration is not authorized by law.

2. The contents of the affidavit, filed in support of the writ petition by the son of the alleged detenue, are as under:

(a) The detenue, who is a resident of Chennai, was arrested by the 6th respondent/Station House Officer, Mydukur Police Station, Kadapa District on 24.8.2017 in Crime No. 452 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 379, 307, 353, 332, 120-B, 417, 468, 471, 109 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 20(1)(c), (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi), (x) of A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 1967, Section 20(d), (i), (a), (b), (ii), (a), (b) of A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, Rule 3 of A.P. Sandal Wood & Red Sanders Wood Transit Rules, 1969, Section 29(2)(b) of A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016 and Section 3 of PDPP Act, 1984. Later he was granted bail on 5.3.2018 vide Crl. MP No. 645 of 2018. It is stated that the detenue was remanded to custody in two other cas
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top