D.V.S.S. Somayajulu, J.

1. This second appeal is filed questioning the judgment and decree passed in A.S. No. 9 of 2005 by the VI Additional District Judge, Narsapur confirming the decree and judgment passed in O.S. No. 138 of 1999 by the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur.

2. The appeal was taken up for hearing on the question of admission.

3. This Court has heard Sri S.V. Prasad, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri D.S.V.V.S.V. Prasad for the appellant and Sri P. Durga Prasad and Sri S.V.R. Subrahmanyam, Advocates for the contesting respondents.

4. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants traced the history of the case and brought out the important facts. According to the learned senior counsel, the suit is filed for recovery of property that has been encroached by the defendants. The prayer in the suit is for recovery of possession of two bits of vacant site measuring 147 square yards and 25 square yards respectively and for a permanent injunction from interfering with the plaintiffs' possession of the property after they are put into possession. Learned counsel points out that the plaintiffs have title which can be traced to the documents which a