M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.

1. One Atluru Chandra Sekhara Rao, petitioner herein and defendant in OS No. 68 of 2017 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the award passed by the Mandal Legal Services Committee. Gudivada under the provisions of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (for short, 'Act').

2. The first respondent filed OS No. 68 of 2017 claiming declaration that the Revocation Deed dated 19.3.2012 bearing document Nos. 2689/2012 and 2691/2012 are null and void, inoperative and consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants including the petitioner from ever interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, alleging that, on 8.2.2012 the defendant has executed two settlement deeds, settling the plaint schedule properties vide document Nos. 1213/2012 and 1214/2012 and by virtue of the said documents, item No. 1 which is the agricultural land retained with the defendant during his life time and he is entitle to enjoy the usufruct from the same and whereas, plaint schedule item No. 2 is put in the possessi