SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 800

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Tammineni Pullaiah – Appellant
Versus
Gogineni Muthaiah – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Meharchand Nori

JUDGMENT :

D.V.S.S. Somayajulu, J.

1. The brief facts are as follows-plaintiff No. 1, during his life time, filed the suit in OS No. 108 of 1985 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Khammam, for recovery of certain amounts. Plaintiff Nos. 2 and 3 are the wife and son of plaintiff No. 1 respectively. Plaintiff No. 1 and defendant No. 3 were partners of the firm under the name and style "M/s. Ekkala Hanumantharao and Company Kirana and Commission Business", Gandhi Chowk, Khammam, which deals with purchase and sale of chillies, bran, horse gram, ground nut oil cake etc., Similarly, plaintiff No. 1 (deceased) and the 4th defendant who was the son of 3rd defendant were also partners of another firm under the name and style of M/s. Ekkala Hanumantharao and Company", Gandhi Chowk, Khammam, which deals with sale of agriculture produce in grain market, Khammam. Differences arose between above partners with regard to settlement of accounts of the above firms with effect from 3.11.1983. When plaintiff No. 1 was planning for dissolution of the above firm and rendition of accounts, defendant Nos. 1 and 2, on behalf of 3rd and 4th defendants volunteered to settle the dispute and accordi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top