SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 868

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Narendra M. Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. , Revenue Dept. Hyderabad – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.B. Vijay Kumar

ORDER :

M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J.

1. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners seeking verbatim the following relief:

"For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the proceedings of Spl. Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition in proceedings No. AA/771/2006 dt. 21-5-2007 under Sec. 9(3) and 10 of L.A. Act, in not including the lands of the petitioners with regard to D. No. 3-6-369 and the proceedings of the 7th respondent in Lr. No. 3/ACP/C3/TPS/RW/2007 dt. 8-5-2007 treating the petitioners' land as Govt. land to deny compensation under the Land Acquisition Act and the proceedings of the 5th respondent in Case No. B/3234/2005 dt. 29-7-2006 confirming the order No. D/991/2006 dt. 24-6-2006 of the 6th respondent under the provisions of A.P.L.E. Act as illegal, unwarranted, unjustifiable in the eye of law, initiated with a mala fide intention and violative of Art, 14 and 300-A of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top