ORDER :

C. Praveen Kumar, J.

1. Aggrieved by the order, dated 3.11.2017, passed in IA No. 1706 of 2017 in FDIA No. 210 of 2013 in OS No. 16 of 2002 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Pithapuram, wherein an application filed under Order I Rule 10 and Order VI Rule 17 of C.P.C. read with Rule 28 of Civil Rules of Practice, to implead the petitioners as necessary parties in the final decree petition was dismissed, the present civil revision petition came to be filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.

2. The facts which lead to filing of the civil revision petition would show that one P.V. Chiranjeevi, who is the second petitioner herein alongwith another made an application for passing of final decree by appointing an Advocate Commissioner for partition of suit schedule property, as they are the legal representatives of one P. Sri. Ramulu, who died on 10.9.2016, leaving behind the petitioners. It is said that a preliminary decree was passed in OS No. 16 of 2002 in favour of their father. It is also said that a registered will deed dated 4.8.2015 came to be executed in their favour by their father with sound and disposed state of mind. As such, they filed an application for adding them as ne