G.SHYAM PRASAD
Pabbiti Vijaya – Appellant
Versus
Bale Mangamma – Respondent
ORDER :
G. SHYAM PRASAD, J.
1. This revision is arising out of order, dated 7.2.2019 passed in IA No. 49 of 2019 in OS No. 52 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the revision petitioner is the defendant in OS No. 52 of 2012. The said suit was filed by the 1st respondent herein against the petitioner for possession of schedule property after evicting the defendants there from.
3. The respondent/plaintiff in order to prove possession over the schedule property got measured the land through a mandal surveyor and submitted a report of the mandal surveyor and rough sketch before the Court. The petitioner/defendant contends that the mandal surveyor has not given any notice while measuring the land and she had totally denied the report submitted by the respondent before the Court. It is the case of the petitioner/defendant that she had never encroached the property of the respondent. Therefore, the petitioner has filed an application in IA No. 49 of 2019 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for noting down the physical features of her property and the property of the respondent with reference to the title
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.