SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(AP) 119

G.SHYAM PRASAD
Pabbiti Vijaya – Appellant
Versus
Bale Mangamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Subba Reddy

ORDER :

G. SHYAM PRASAD, J.

1. This revision is arising out of order, dated 7.2.2019 passed in IA No. 49 of 2019 in OS No. 52 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the revision petitioner is the defendant in OS No. 52 of 2012. The said suit was filed by the 1st respondent herein against the petitioner for possession of schedule property after evicting the defendants there from.

3. The respondent/plaintiff in order to prove possession over the schedule property got measured the land through a mandal surveyor and submitted a report of the mandal surveyor and rough sketch before the Court. The petitioner/defendant contends that the mandal surveyor has not given any notice while measuring the land and she had totally denied the report submitted by the respondent before the Court. It is the case of the petitioner/defendant that she had never encroached the property of the respondent. Therefore, the petitioner has filed an application in IA No. 49 of 2019 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for noting down the physical features of her property and the property of the respondent with reference to the title

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top