CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Lingam Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sowmya Lingam – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since both these Criminal Petitions are filed by the accused in Crime No.69 of 2018 of Women Police Station, Kurnool, seeking quash of F.I.R. under Section 482 Cr.P.C, both the petitions were heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Petitioners in Crl.P.No.6376 of 2019 are accused Nos.1 and 2 and petitioners in Crl.P.No.6976 of 2019 are accused Nos.3 and 4 in the above crime.
3. Shorn of the irrelevant details, facts germane to dispose of both these Criminal Petitions may be stated as follows: Accused No.1 is the husband of the de facto complainant.
4. Accused No.2 is the father-in-law of the de facto complainant. Accused Nos.3 and 4 are the sister and brother-in-law of accused No.1.
5. The de facto complainant lodged a report with the Police stating that her marriage was performed with accused No.1 in Vizag. Thereafter, they have setup a family in Hyderabad, where accused No.1 is living in pursuance of his employment and they lead conjugal life. Accused No.2, who is the father of accused No.1, also resided with them in Hyderabad. After their marriage, accused No.1 started harassing the de facto complainant making unlawful demands. Accused No.1 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.