SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.S.NARAYANA
M. Satyanarayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Rukma Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. V. Ravikiran Rao, Adv.
For the Respondent: M/s. B.V. Bakshi, M.P. Ugle, Advs.

JUDGMENT :

Defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.58/82 on the file of District Judge, Adilabad, aggrieved by the Judgment and decree of the trial Court had preferred the above Appeal and defendants 5 to 9 had preferred the Cross Objections wherein they had questioned the marriage of Rajeshwar Reddy with the 1st plaintiff and the 2nd defendant.

2. For the purpose of convenience the parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants only as shown in O.S.No.59/82.

3. The said suit was filed by the plaintiff for partition and separate possession of22/45th share in the plaint schedule properties. The trial Court after the respective pleadings of the parties and settlement of Issues had examined P.W.1 to P.W.5, D.W.1 to D.W.12 and had marked Exs.A-1 to A-16 and also Exs.B-1 to B-173 and ultimately had passed a preliminary decree and aggrieved by the same, the present appeal and the Cross-Objections had been preferred.

4. The plaintiffs had pleaded in the plaint as follows:

The suit properties consisting of Ac.2-26 guntas situated in Adilabad Revenue village and a house situated in Adilabad town and cash which is in deposit in Andhra Bank branch, Adilabad are the self acquisitions of late Rajeshw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top