ORDER :

P.S. Narayana, J.

The Civil Revision Petition is filed by 2nd Judgment-debtor in E.P. No. 26/97 in O.S. No. 67/97 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam.

2. The respondent-Decree-holder filed E.P. No. 26/97 in O.S. No. 67/97 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam against two Judgment-debtors, the father and the son, seeking their arrest for realization of the decretal amount. On behalf of the Decree-holder, P.W.1 was examined and on behalf of the Judgment-debtors, they had examined themselves as R.Ws.1 and 2 and Exs.B-1 and B-2 were marked. The Court below had arrived at the conclusion that the Decree-holder is not entitled to seek the arrest of Judgment-debtor No.1 i.e. the father, but had ordered the arrest and detention of Judgment-debtor No. 2 only and Judgment-debtor No. 2, aggrieved by the said order had filed the present Civil Revision Petition.

3. Sri Ram Gopal, learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner had made elaborate submissions and had contended that the evidence available as against Judgment-debtors 1 and 2 is one and the same and the Court below had totally erred in ordering the arrest of Judgment-debtor No. 2 having arrived at th