C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, M.GANGA RAO
Jampani Krishna Babu – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent
ORDER :
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
1. Challenging the Order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Guntur, in an application filed by the Secured Creditor under Section 14(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 ['SARFAESI Act'], the borrowers/Petitioners filed the present Writ Petition under Section (sic Article) 226 of the Constitution of India.
2. The facts, in nutshell, are as under:
(ii) The 1st Respondent Bank issued Section 13(2) notice calling upon the Petitioners to pay the outstanding dues in the loan accounts within 60 days. Thereafter, the 1st Respondent Bank initiated action under Section 13(4) of the Act and took symbolic possession of th
Kerala High Court in Canara Bank Limited v. Stephen John and others : 2018 (3) KHC 670
Ayishumma v. Hassan : 2009 (3) KLT 399]
South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Union of India : 2010 (4) KLT 657]
Shankarlal Aggarwala v. Shankarlal Poddar : AIR 1965 SC 507)
Tulsi Rocks Pvt. Ltd. v. Bank of India; 2019(3) ALD 254
Standard Chartered Bank & Ors. v. V. Noble Kumar & Ors. 2013 (9) SCC 620
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.