SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 949

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Nischint Constructions Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Khader Nawaz Khan – Respondent


ORDER :

M. Seetharama Murti, J.

1. This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the unsuccessful petitioners/defendants 14, 15 & 16 is directed against the orders, dated 22.03.2017, of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, passed in I.A. No. 551 of 2016 in I.A. no. 1507 of 2013 in O.S. no. 471 of 1987.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri P. Sri Raghu Ram, learned senior counsel appearing for Sri P. Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioners 1 to 3; Sri Sunil B. Ganu, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd petitioner, with the consent of the learned counsel for the said petitioner; Sri M.V.S. Suresh Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for Sri M.V. Pratap Kumar & A. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 7; Sri Dantu Srinivas, learned counsel for respondent no. 9; Sri M.A.K. Mukheed, learned counsel for respondent no. 16; and of Sri V.L.N.G.K. Murthy, learned senior counsel appearing for Sri P. Nageswara Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 18, 20 & 21. I have perused the material record.

3. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as arrayed in this civil r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top