IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
Konduru Babu Rao Chinna – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No.16615 of 2019
Decided On : 27-01-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226, 14 and 21 - Quash rowdy sheet - Interfere with life and liberty - It is case of petitioner that petitioner is resident of colony Guntur and he was running pharmaceutical shop in name and style of Mani Medical and Fancy Store Apartments – Thereafter shifted shop to own premises at Plot Colony - Petitioner suffered heart strokes stents are inserted due to blockages- He needs regular and periodical checkup- As petitioner was blessed with a daughter and wife being working woman he has to take care of his daughter- Due to opening of rowdy sheet against petitioner he is not able to do justice to his family and concentrate on his business- Further it is stated that petitioner is leading respectable life while carrying on business and never involved in any criminal activities- Due to political rivalry petitioner is implicated in false cases - Petitioner is working as NSUI District General Secretary and he was very active in all student activities in district persons having eye sore lodged false complaints which was not registered by police
Finding of court: But here Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders does not authorize such domiciliary visits or surveillance specifically- Even otherwise such domiciliary visits even if any law is subsisting that would not only amount to infringement of privacy of an individual but also life and liberty of an individual- Keeping a watch on movements of this petitioner including domiciliary visits regularly or occasionally would certainly infringe right to liberty and privacy which is guaranteed under Article 21 of Constitution of India to any citizen - Turning to facts of present case petitioner was found not guilty in two sessions cases and other crimes were closed against this petitioner - Admission made in counter affidavit is suffice to conclude that no case is pending against this petitioner and those crimes were registered long back - Thus as on there is no material to show that petitioner is continuously involving in any acts causing disturbances to public peace and tranquility - In absence of any material to establish that this petitioner is involved in any acts causing disturbance to public peace and tranquillit continuation of rowdy sheet/history sheet against this petitioner is illegal- Accordingly point is answered in favour of petitioner and against respondents
Result: Writ petition is allowed
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in retention of the Rowdy Sheet No.640A/GU dated 15-04-1997 on the petitioner as illegal, irregular arbitrary unconstitutional unjustified and without jurisdiction and violative of the Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash the rowdy sheet and direct the respondents not to interfere with life and liberty of the petitioner in any manner”
2. It is the case of the petitioner that petitioner is resident of KVP colony, 2/1 Guntur and he was running pharmaceutical shop in the name and style of “Mani Medical and Fancy Stores”, Flat No.C-1, Sai Villa Apartments, Lalapuram Road, Chuttugunta, Guntur from 30.10.2012 till June, 2019. Thereafter, shifted shop to own premises at Plot No.760, KVP Colony, Guntur. The petitioner suffered heart strokes stents are inserted due to blockages. He needs regular and periodical checkup. As the petitioner was blessed with a daughter and wife being working woman, he has to take care of his daughter. Due to opening of rowdy sheet against the petitioner, he is not able to do justice to his family and concentrate on his business. Further, it is stated that, the petitioner is leading respectable life while carrying on business and never involved in any criminal activities. Due to political rivalry, the petitioner is implicated in false cases.
3. It is also submitted that, the petitioner shifted to Hyderabad in the year 1998 and stayed there till his marriage in 2009. After marriage, the petitioner moved to Vijayawada and he has been shuttling between Guntur and Vijayawada and now settled at Guntur. History sheet was opened in 1997 on political pressures, implicating him the following list of cases in which the petitioner has been arrayed as accused:
| S. No | Crime No | Offences | Police station/Court |
| 1 | Cr.No.35 of 1993 | Sections 354, 509, 427, 510 I.P.C | Nagarampalem (L&O) P.S, Guntur Town |
| 2 | P.R.C.No.3 of 1997 | Section 354 I.P.C | IV Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur |
| 3 | C.C.No.67 of 1997 | Sections 448, 427 & 506 IPC | IV Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur |
| 4 | Cr.No.24 of 1997 | Sections 323 & 452 IPC | Nagarampalem (L&O) P.S, Guntur Town |
4. The petitioner submitted that the above crimes were registered against him at the instance of local politicians. During the year 1997, the petitioner is working as NSUI District General Secretary and he was very active in all the student activities in the district, persons having eye sore lodged false complaints which was not registered by the police. During surprise visits made by the then Chief Minister in the year 1997, one lady who is inimical to him, gave complaint against the petitioner in the police station and also approached Superintendent of Police, Guntur. The police found that the complaint is false and did not register complaint. Then that lady complained the same to the then Chief Minister during his surprise visit. The Hon’ble Chief Minister after listening her grievance in public, scolded police officers from the rank of S.I to S.P. Immediately, all the police registered three false complaints and on the next day arrested the petitioner and his friends. Rowdy/history sheets were also opened on the same day illegally without following due procedure. Initially, rowdy sheet was opened at Kothapet Police Station, Guntur and the same was transferred to Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur, since the petitioner shifted his residence and that the petitioner did not involve in any case and consequently, the petitioner made a request to the respondents to close the rowdy sheet, but no action was taken and his
B. Satyanarayana Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad
Dhanji Ram Sharma v. Superintendent of Police, North District, Delhi Police and others
Dhanji Ram Sharma vs. Superintendent of Police, North District, Delhi Police
Gurubachan Singh v. Commissioner of Police
Hari Khemu Gawali v. Deputy Commissioner of Police
Jolly George Verghese & Another vs. The Bank of Cochin
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd) and another v. Union of India
Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Majid Babu vs. Government of A.P.
Malak Singh v. State of Punjab and Haryana
Sunkara Satyanarayana v. State of Andhra Pradesh
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.