SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(SC) 36

M. C. MAHAJAN, S. R. DASS, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, B. K. MUKHERJEE, N. CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR
Gurbachan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
G.N.Joshi, H.J.Umrigar, P.A.Mehta, P.K.CHATTERJI

Judgment

B. K. MUKHERJEA, J. : This is an application under Art. 32 of the Constitution, presented by one Gurbachan Singh, praying for a writ, in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents as well as their subordinates and successors from enforcing an externment order, served on the petitioner under S. 27 (1) of the City of Bombay Police Act (1902).

2. The petitioner is an Indian citizen and is said to be residing with his father at a place called Gogri Niwas . Vincent Road, Dadar, his father having a business in electrical goods in the city of Bombay. On the 23rd July, 1951, the petitioner was served with an order purporting to have been made by the Commissioner of Police, Bombay, under S. 27 (1) of the City of Bombay Police Act. directing him to remove himself from Greater Bombay and go to his native place at Amritsar in East Punjab. It was mentioned in the order that the petitioner was to comply with its directions within two days from the date it was made, and that he was to proceed to Amritsar by rail. On July 25, 1951, the petitioner made an application to the Commissioner of Police and prayed for an extension of the time within which he was to remove himself from Grea














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top