ORDER :

1. These two civil revision petitions are filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short “C.P.C.”) challenging the orders dated 12.11.2014 passed in E.A. Nos. 263 and 264 of 2014 in E.P. No. 130 of 2007 in O.S. No. 418 of 2005 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, whereby the petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 721 days in filing petition to set aside ex-parte order dated 24.04.2009 (subject matter of C.R.P. No. 4896 of 2014) and the petition filed Under Order XXI Rule 105 and 106 and Section 151 of C.P.C. to set aside the ex-parte order dated 24.04.2009 (subject matter of C.R.P. No. 4904 of 2014), were dismissed.

2. The petitioner is the Judgment Debtor. The petitioner and the respondents in both the petitions are one and the same and the impugned order passed by the Executing Court in E.A. No. 264 of 2014 is a consequential order of E.A. No. 263 of 2014. Therefore, I find that it is expedient to decide both the revisions by common order.

3. During pendency of the revision, respondent No. 3 was impleaded as party in both the revisions as per the orders in CRPMP No. 2239 of 2015 in CRP No. 4896 of 2014 and CRPM