M.VENKATA RAMANA
Nepcon Nat. Engg. , Projects Constru. – Appellant
Versus
Murapaka Satyanarayana – Respondent
ORDER :
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner under Workmen Compensation Act cum Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Circle - II, Visakhapatnam, in W.C. case No.17 of 2003 dated 24.01.2004.
2. The appellants are the opposite parties and the respondents were the applicants in the enquiry before the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation (Commissioner for ‘short’).
3. The respondents laid a claim application to award a compensation of Rs.4,36,940/-and for costs, on account of death of Sri M.T.S.Kumar. The respondents 1 and 2 are his parents and the third respondent is his younger brother. The first respondent as a contracting agency had undertaken certain works in the manufacturing unit of the second respondent, where usually they were producing sulpher phospate and manufacturing fertilizers.
4. The deceased Sri M.T.S.Kumar, was an employee and a painter for the first appellant according to the respondents. They further claimed that on 03.05.2002 at about 8.50 a.m. when Sri M.T.S.Kumar, was attending to painting work at the factory premises of the second appellant at the top level, he fell down accidentally due to chemical reaction and received gr
DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC v. GURRAPU ANJAMMA
JYOTHI ADEMMA v. PLANT ENGINEER, NELLORE
MANDERBHANI COLLIERY v. PHULWANTI DEVI
MACKINNON MACKENZIE AND CO.PRIVATE LIMITED v. IBRAHIM MAHOMMAD ISSAK
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. N.SAROJINI AND OTHERS
REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESI CORPORATION v. FRANCIS DE COSTA AND ANOTHER
SMT.ANANTHAMMA v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, CO.OP. SPINNING MILLS LTD. RAICHUR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.