M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Perumalla Madhusudhan Rao – Appellant
Versus
AP TRANSCO – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners, who were working under the contractor – M/s.Sterling and Wilson Private Limited, filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the AP TRANSCO and its officials to declare the action of respondent No.3 in orally terminating the services of the petitioners from Electrical High Tension 132/33 KV Sub-Station, Vinjamuru and not allowing petitioners for duties with effect from 23.11.2020 on the ground that the contract of the then contractor of Electrical High Tension 132/33 KV Sub-Station, Vinjamuru vide letter dated 20.11.2020 of respondent No.3 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, contrary to the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in para 46 at page 151 in “State of Haryana v. Piara Singh, (1992) 4 SCC 118” and also in para-18 of the judgment in “K. Ravinder v. A.P. Generation Corporation Limited, Hyderabad, (2000) 6 ALD 56” and contrary to the letter and spirit of the Memo No. CGM (HRD/ DS/ AS.III/ PO.VII /Adm/D.No.3596/04, dated 27.12.2004 besides violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and conseq
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.