M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
P. Devakanth – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent
ORDER:
The relief claimed in both the writ petitions is as follows:
To issue Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned G.O.Rt.No.1411 Revenue (Endts.III) Department dated 28.11.2019 of the 1st Respondent as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, void and without jurisdiction and contrary to TTD Employees Service Rules, 1989 issued in G.O.Ms.No.1060 Revenue (Endowment-I) Department dated 24.10.1989 and set-aside the same and also declare the action of the respondents in not absorbing or not regularizing the services of the petitioners as Librarian in the existing vacancies under the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and unconstitutional, violating Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions directing the respondents to forthwith absorb/regularize the services of the petitioners as Librarians in the existing vacancies before filling up the existing post of Librarians either by way of direct recruitment or by way of promotion or any other method and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioners as Librarians under the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent till regularizing/absorbing
AIR India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union
B.N. Nagarajan v. State of Karnataka (1979) 4 SCC 507
Surendra Kumar & ors. V. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & ors
State of Mysore v. S.V. Narayanappa: (1967) 1 SCR 128
State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi
Yogesh Mahajan v. Professor R.C. Deka, Director, All India Institute Of Medical Sciences
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.