M.VENKATA RAMANA
Kandula Radha Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Kumari Narra Naga Yellamani Ratna Teja – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. Venkata Ramana, J.
1. It is said, "Blood is thicker than water". It is not always so. This case illustrates such an unfortunate exception of a granddaughter, who lost her mother within a few days of her birth, who is denied a justifiable share in the family properties by her maternal grandmother. Yet, the grandmother was not successful during her lifetime and the will of the grandfather prevailed to give away due share in his estate to his granddaughter. A La conflict of filial bondage and economic interests in a Hindu Family is mirrored.
2. A.S. No. 1789 of 2002 is instituted by the defendants and whereas A.S. No. 181 of 2003 is instituted by the plaintiff. The decree and judgment in O.S. No. 86 of 1994 on the file of the Court of learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, dated 23.04.2002, are subject matter in these two appeals.
3. The first appellant (first defendant) in A.S. No. 1789 of 2002 died on 05.04.2008. A memo was filed on behalf of the respondent (the plaintiff) on 12.06.2012 in this appeal bringing this fact to the notice of this Court while
Anathula Sudhakar v. P. Buchi Reddy
Gandevalla Jayaram Reddy v. Mokkala Padmayathamma and others
H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma
Kalyan Singh v. Chhoti and others
P. Buchi Reddy and others v. Anathula Sudhakar
Rabindra Nath Mukherjee and another v. Panchanan Banerjee (dead) by L.Rs. and others
Ryali Kameswara Rao v. Bendapudi Suryaprakasarao and others
Sarupuri Narayanamma and others v. Kadiyala Venkatasubbaiah and others
Savithri and others v. Karthyayani Amma and others
Surendra Pal and others v. Dr. (Mrs.) Saraswati Arora and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.