BATTU DEVANAND
Sai Krishna Pidathala – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri R. Siva Sai Swaroop, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise appearing for the respondents. Perused the material available on record.
2. This writ petition has been filed against the action of the respondents particularly 3rd respondent retaining the vehicle of the petitioner (i.e) Car M/s.RENAULT - KWID RXT 1.0 BS IV bearing registration No.TS 29 H 9863 in the police station without any crime nor any records officially to show the seizure of the vehicle by proper identification through a Registration Number/Chasis Number/Colour, Owner, etc., as illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, against the law and procedure and subsequently to direct the 3rd respondent to return the vehicle to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the resident of Telangana State and he is doing a private job at Nalgonda District. He is having a motor car M/s.RENAULT - KWID RXT 1.0 BS IV bearing registration No.TS 29 H 9863. There is no any criminal case or any other cases as against the petitioner or against the vehicle of the petitioner. Recently, the Andhra Pradesh p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.