Back
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Velivela Sarojini – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. inheritance rights upon intestate death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural flaws in land record alterations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. claimants' assertions regarding the will. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. applicant's failure to pursue available remedies. (Para 12) |
| 5. requirements for writ of mandamus. (Para 20 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. rights of parties in contesting property claims. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. scope and limits of article 226 powers. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 8. mandatory compliance with statutory notice requirements. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 9. judgment allowing writ petition due to violations. (Para 68 , 69) |
JUDGMENT
Smt. Velivela Sarojini w/o late Sri V. Purnachandra Rao, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of Respondents 3 & 4 in altering the names in records of rights and mutating the names of Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 and issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds in their favour with Khata Nos.906 and 918 in respect of land of following extent of land in Gudavalli Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
