Velivela Sarojini vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(AP) 333

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Velivela Sarojini – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Sri G. Venkateswara Rao representing Sri Somu Krishna Murthy, learned counsel, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Smt. Velivela Sarojini w/o late Sri V. Purnachandra Rao, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of Respondents 3 & 4 in altering the names in records of rights and mutating the names of Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 and issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds in their favour with Khata Nos.906 and 918 in respect of land of following extent of land in Gudavalli Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District.

S.No	Sy.No	Extent	Village and Mandal
1	Ac.0-15 cents	Sy.No.185-5A	Gudavalli Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District
2	Ac.1-17 cents	Sy.No.185/4
3	Ac.0-22 cents	Sy.No.191/4B
4	Ac.0-20 cents	Sy.No.191/4A
5	Ac.0-86 cents	Sy.No.191/3
6	Ac.0-85 cents	Sy.No.191/2
7	Ac.0-09 cents	Sy.No.191/1

2. The petitioner is the wife of Sri V. Purnachandra Rao. She is in possession and enjoyment of the land referred above situated in Gudavalli Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District. The petitioner was blessed with only tw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(AP) 333

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHYVelivela Sarojini – AppellantVersusState of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Velivela Sarojini – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent