SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 394

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
K. Hanumantha Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Mandamus and to set aside the disciplinary proceedings which are pending from December, 2013. He also seeks consequential relief for effecting regular promotion on par with his juniors.

2. This Court has heard Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner was working as Inspector of Police and was promoted as Deputy Superintendent of Police on ad hoc basis on 16.07.2020. He was issued a Charge Memo on 06.12.2013 for some alleged offences and the matter was referred to the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings (in Tribunal Enquiry Case No.18 of 2013). Learned counsel argues that from 2013 till date no effective proceedings have been taken and that because of the pendency of the enquiry proceedings the petitioner’s juniors were already promoted and petitioner is denied promotion. He argues that this delay is ground enough to quash all further proceedings. He relies upon the judgments which are filed by him and in particular the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top