IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, B. KRISHNA MOHAN, JJ.
Kondru Sambaiah Guntur Dist S/o Veeraiah – Appellant
Versus
P.P., Hyd Rep by its Public Prosecutor - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.940 of 2015
Decided on : 06-10-2021
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 207 and 209 - Offence of Murder - Post-mortem examination - By its Judgment Sessions Judge while acquitting for offence punishable Section 302 read with 34 IPC convicted A.1 for offence punishable Section 302 IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of amount in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months - Substance of charge against accused is that about at New Bridge Near Bus Shelter village of accused caused death by beating him with a stout stick - Deceased was acting as an elder of caste people in village - On morning of there was an altercation between deceased an Hotel in connection with pesticide issue - During that process A.1 interfered and pushed deceased aside questioning his domination in their caste society and also abusing him - At that point of time deceased pushed A.1 due to which A.1 got angry and threatened to see his end by that day - So saying he left place - After altercation deceased returned home and informed PW.4 who was present in house as to what happened at Ravi Hotel - On that day deceased wanted to go attend his work and asked to accompany him due to fear of and deceased went to Ponnuru and after completion of work they boarded a RTC bus and got down at drainage bridge of their village to go to their house.
Finding of the court :
Hon’ble Supreme Court categorically held that in every case where death was due to single blow given on a vital part it cannot be said that there was an intention to cause death - Hon’ble Supreme Court further held that it depends upon of each case - In order to find out same it would be appropriate for us to refer to evidence of doctor who conducted post mortem over dead body of deceased - In his evidence stated that he commenced post mortem examination and found a contusion over occipital region measuring scalp - According to him cause of death was due to head injury followed by respiratory and cardiac arrest - A reading of cross-examination of doctor would show that if more force is used with it would cause a lacerated injury and if only an ordinary force is used with it causes only a contusion - Since injury found on deceased was a contusion it can be said without any doubt that only an ordinary force was used while causing injury meaning thereby more force/substantial force was not used at time of causing injury - Apart from that evidence of who was examined as panch witness to scene of offence admits in his cross-examination that as per mediators report blood stains of the deceased were found on the inside edge of parapet wall of culvert - He further stated that stick was not measured in his presence and that he cannot say whether it is a fresh stick or dried one and there is no special identification marks on to say that same stick was seized at that time.
Result: Appeal Allowed
JUDGMENT:
(Sri Justice C. Praveen Kumar)
Heard Sri G. Vijayasaradhi, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant and Sri S. Dhushyanth Reddy, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, through Blue Jeans video conferencing APP and with their consent, the appeal is disposed of.
1. Accused 1 and 2 in Sessions Case No.576 of 2014 on the file of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenali, were tried for offences punishable under Section 302 and Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code [‘I.P.C.’] for causing the death of one Darsi Dibbaiah @ Adam [‘deceased’] on 19.04.2014 at about 2:00P.M. at New Bridge, Near Bus Shelter, Bodapadu village of Amarthaluru Mandal. By its Judgment, dated 06.07.2015, the learned Sessions Judge, while acquitting A.2 for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 IPC, convicted A.1 for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.
2. The substance of the charge against the accused is that on 19.04.2014 at about 2:00P.M. at New Bridge, Near Bus Shelter, Bodapadu village of Amarthaluru Mandal, the accused caused death of Darsi Dibbaiah @ Adam by beating him with a stout stick.
3. The case of the prosecution as unfolded by the prosecution witnesses is as under:
ii) The deceased was acting as an elder of caste people in the village. On the morning of 19.04.2014, there was an altercation between the deceased and PW.4 at Ravi Hotel in connection with pesticide issue. During that process, A.1 interfered and pushed the deceased aside, questioning his domination in their caste society and also abusing him. At that point of time, the deceased pushed A.1 due to which A.1 got angry and threatened to see his end by that day. So saying he left the place. After the altercation, the deceased returned home and informed PW.4, who was present in the house, as to what happened at Ravi Hotel. On that day, the deceased wanted to go to Ponnuru to attend his work and asked PW.1 to accompany him due to fear of A.1. PW.1 and the deceased went to Ponnuru and after completion of work, they boarded a RTC bus at Ponnuru and got down at drainage bridge of their village to go to their house. It is said that while they were walking towards their house, A.2 intercepted and started beating the deceased with hands questioning him as to why he beat his father in the morning. Meanwhile, A.1 came with a stick and stating as to why there should be a conversation with his son, beat the deceased on his head with a stick, due to which the deceased tripled down to the ground. When A1 and A.2 were beating the deceased who was lying on the ground, PW.1 raised cries loudly and on hearing the same, PW.3, LW.6-Pratap and LW.7-Chukka Vijay Kumar @ Jakraiah came there. On seeing them, the accused ran away. They called an auto and shifted the injured to Government Hospital, Nidubrolu where the doctor declared him dead. PW.1 went to Amarthaluru police station and lodged a report before PW.8 at 5:30P.M., which came to be registered as a case in Crime No.28 of 2014 for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 IPC. Ex.P.7 is the FIR.
iii) PW.9-the Inspector of Police, on receiving information, proceeded to the police station, collected copy of FIR and took up investigation. He then, proceeded to the scene of offence and observed the scene. As it was late night, he posted a guard to preserve the scene of offence. He also proceeded to the Government Hospital, Nidubrolu, verified the dead body and posted a guard at the hospital. On the next day i.e. on 20.04.2014, PW.9 examined the scene of offence in the presence o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.