IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D.V.S.S. Somayajulu, J.
M.R.L. Sankara Rao and others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and others – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos.10474 and 10034 of 2021
Decided On : 12-11-2021
Constitution of India - Article 309 - Posts of Secondary Grade Teachers(SGTS) Scheme of Selection Rules, 2018 - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, - Section 23 - NCTE Act. - Section 12 (A) - Appointment For - Post of - Assistants(SAs), Language - Teacher Recruitment - Court It is therefore submitted that in view of legal position of law petitioners are entitled to relief - Prayer is made in both these writ petitions for declaring action of respondents in issuing G.O.Ms. as arbitrary illegal and ultra vires and to set aside same - A consequential direction prayed for is to direct respondents to complete selection process for appointment to post of School Assistant (Telugu) and Language Pandit (Telugu) - Whether rules of game have actually been changed in case – Held, Court has to agree that petitioner’s rights are not trammeled or taken away in any manner - Educational qualifications remain same age criteria remains same examination remains same and selection process remains same - Certain number of additional candidates with a Post Graduate Degree were allowed to participate in examination – Court may increase competition but beyond that there is no tangible direct loss to petitioners nor are their vested rights effected - Court while exercising the power of judicial review is also concerned with the “decision making process - Need or necessity to prescribe its educational qualifications is not a matter of judicial review - Court does not find proper pleading and proof that subsequent introduction of PG Degree is for an ulterior motive or for a mala fide purpose - State pleaded clearly that in order to ensure that NCTE regulations and standards are followed supplementary G.O. was issued. - Court does not find any reason to suspect explanation given by State material is placed by petitioners to doubt reason - In addition as noticed earlier even in earlier Notification issued like G.O.Ms. a Post Graduate Degree is prescribed both for School Assistant and for Language Pandit - Court does not lead to a conclusion that M.A. Telugu Degree holders have acquired their Master Degree without possessing a Degree in Telugu as a main subject - For all these above mentioned reasons Court is of opinion that Writ Petitions have to fail - Writ Petitions are dismissed
ORDER :
1. In both these Writ Petitions the challenge is to G.O.Ms.No.70 School Education (Exams) Department, dated 05.11.2018. The prayer in these Writ Petitions is to set aside the G.O.Ms.No.70, dated 05.11.2018, which is issued 10 days after the initial G.O.Ms.No.67 School Education (Exams) Department, dated 26.10.2018.
2. This Court for the sake of convenience, at this stage itself is reproducing the first page of the G.O.Ms.No.70, dated 05.11.2018, hereunder to highlight the area of challenge:
ABSTRACT
The Andhra Pradesh Teacher Recruitment Test(TRT) for the posts of School Assistants (SAs), Language Pandits (LPS), Physical Education Teachers(PETS), Music Teachers, Craft Teachers and Art& Drawing Teachers and Teacher Eligibility Test cum Teacher Recruitment Test (TETcumTRT) for the posts of Secondary Grade Teachers(SGTS) Scheme of Selection Rules, 2018- Amendment- Orders - Issued.
SCHOOL EDUCATION (EXAMS) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Ms.No. 70
Dated: 05-11-2018
Read the following:
1. G. O. Ms. No. 67, School Education (Exams) Department, dt:26.10.2018.
2. From the Commissioner of School Education, Andhra Pradesh Lr.Rc.No.ESE02-20021/6/2018-RECTMT-CSE, Dt: 27.10.2018.
*****
ORDER :-
In the Government Order 1" read above, The Andhra Pradesh Teacher Recruitment Test(TRT) for the posts of School Assistants(SAs), Language Pandits (LPs), Physical Education Teachers(PETS), Music Teachers, Craft Teachers and Art& Drawing Teachers and Teacher Eligibility Test cum Teacher Recruitment Test (TET-cum-TRT) for the posts of Secondary Grade Teachers (SGTs)-Scheme of Selection Rules, 2018 were issued.
2. In the circumstances stated by the Commissioner of School Education, AP, Ibrahimpatnam in the letter 2nd read above, Government after careful examination of the matter, Government hereby issue the following amendments to the aforesaid Rules issued in G. O. Ms. No. 67, School Education (Exams) Department, dt: 26.10.2018.
AMENDMENTS
1. Para 4(2)(i)(f) Para shall be substituted as follows.
| Existing Para | Substituted with |
| Must possess a Bachelor's Degree with Telugu as the main subject or one of the three equal optional subjects or Bachelor's Degree in Oriental Language in Telugu (B.O.L) or its equivalent and B.Ed with Telugu as methodology Subject or Telugu Pandit Training or its equivalent. | Must possess a Bachelor's Degree with Telugu as the main subject or one of the three equal optional subjects or Bachelor's Degree in Oriental Language in Telugu (B.O.L) or its equivalent or a Post Graduate Degree in Telugu and B.Ed with Telugu as methodology Subject or Telugu Pandit Training or its equivalent. |
3. This Court has heard Sri S.Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.10474 of 2021 and Sri P.V.Krishnaiah in W.P.No.10034 of 2021, learned Additional Advocate General Sri P.Sudhakar Reddy for the respondent- State and Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned counsel for the implead petitioners/respondents 3 to 20 in W.P.No.10474 of 2021 and for implead petitioners/respondents 3 to 18 in W.P.No.10034 of 2021; Sri Bobbili Srinivas, learned counsel for the implead petitioners / respondents 21 to 29 in W.P.No.10474 of 2021 and for the implead petitioners/respondents 19 to 24 in W.P.No.10034 of 2021.
4. Both the learned counsel for petitioners very vehemently argued with great passion that the initial G.O.Ms.No.67, dated 26.10.2018 is issued under the powers delegated under Article 309 of the Constitution of India and that the same cannot be amended by way of executive instructions. It is also argued that if the State wishes to prescribe additional qualifications it had to amend the rules that were prevailing as on the date of the notification. It is argued that these are statutory rules which can only be changed by way of amendment only and ne
Dhanjay Malik and Others v State of Uttaranchal and Others
O.P.Lather and Others v Satish Kumar Kakkar and Others
Sant Ram Sharma v State of Rajasthan and Others
Tej Prakash Pathak and Others v Rajasthan High Court and others
V.Lavanya and Others v State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Zahoor Ahmad Rather and Others v Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.