2022 Supreme(AP) 39
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Singana Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Prl. Secy. , Irrigation Dept. , State of A. P. – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ch. C. Krishna Reddy.
For the Respondent: GP For IRRI And CAD AP.
ORDER :
1. W.P.No.27325 of 2018 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following relief :
“To issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in passing Award No.1/2006-07 dated 31.07.2006 on the basis of 2002-03 Standard Schedule Rates (S.S.R.) and paying the compensation even though 4(1) Notification under the Land Acquisition Act was published on 01.10.2005 is arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to pay the compensation basing on the current Standard Schedule Rates (S.S.R.) prevailing on the date of 4(1) Notification dated 01.10.2005 as per the procedure prescribed under the Land Acquisition Act.”
2. W.P.No.11881 of 2018 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following relief :
“To issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in passing Award No.2/2006-07 dated 31.07.2006 on the basis of 2002-03 Standard Schedule Rates (S.S.R) and paying the compensation even though 4(1) Notification under the Land Acquisition Act was published on 01.10.2005 is arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to pay t
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
