PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
HRT Builders – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it’s Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
1. This appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent is filed challenging the order dated 28.04.2020 passed in W.P.No.11176 of 2019 by the learned single Judge, whereby the petition filed by the petitioner for issue of Writ of Mandamus declaring Ad-interim orders issued by respondent No.1 vide G.O.Ms.No.21 Home (General.A) Department dated 28.01.2019 to the extent of attaching the properties belonging to the petitioner at Sl.No.4 and 5 of Annexure to the impugned G.O. as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, contrary to provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositories of Financial Establishments Act, 1999 and violative of principles of Natural Justice, besides being violative of Article 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and set aside the same, was dismissed holding that the petitioner is entitled to avail effective, efficacious alternative remedy available before the Special Court, which is competent to take evidence and deal with the objections.
2. The parties to the appeal will hereinafter be referred as arrayed before the learned single Judge for the sake of convenience and to avoid confusion.
3. The claim of the petitione
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.