C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, K.MANMADHA RAO
State of A. P. rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Mittapalli Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Venkataramana Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
The effect of not trying case and counter case or cross case one after the other by the same Court, is the issue involved in this case. In order to appreciate the same, it would be necessary to refer to few facts.
2. Originally, seven accused were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 302, 326, 323 r/w. Section 149, Section 324 r/w. Section 149 I.P.C. and Section 326 r/w. Section 149 I.P.C in Sessions Case No.132 of 2007. By its Judgment dated 16.05.2012 learned VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madanapalle acquitted the accused of all charges.
3. The gravamen of the charge against the accused, is that on 16.05.2006 at about 5.00 P.M., in front of the house of A.1 at Mittavandlapalle Village, all the accused formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of unlawful assembly, caused the death of one M. Reddeppa Reddy by beating him with stones and sticks on his head indiscriminately. In respect of this incident, a case in Crime No.26 of 2006 of Peddamandyam Police Station came to be registered. After completing the investigation, a Charge Sheet came to be filed which was taken
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.