SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 971

R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Bonela @ Kartheeka Raju, W/o Mokhalingarn – Appellant
Versus
Bonela Jayalaxmi, W/o late Chinnababuo (late) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. GVS Kishore Kumar

ORDER :

1. The 1st respondent filed D.V.C.No.2 of 2020 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pathapatnam, Srikakulam District, for reliefs under Sections 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, against the petitioners herein, who are the family members of her late husband.

2. The trial Court had thereupon issued- a notice in Form-I, under Section 61 of Cr.P.C. Aggrieved by the said notice, the petitioners herein had filed W.P.No.8836 of 2021 before this Court. A Division Bench of this Court, after noticing the Judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in Dr.P.Pathmanathan and others vs. Tint V.Monica and others (2021 (2) CTC 57) and without expressing any view on the said Judgment, had held that a judicial order passed by a Court of law is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and left it open to the petitioner to explore the possibility of invoking the jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution.

3. Thereafter, the petitioners have now approached this Court by way of the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of constitution of India.

4. A perusal of the complaint and the various Judgmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top