Back
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Surapaneni Venkata Ratnam (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Surapaneni Rajeswaramma – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Defendants in the suit filed the above revision against the order dated 31.01.2022 in I.A. No. 1139 of 2019 in O.S. No. 207 of 2019 (old O.S. No. 65 of 2016) on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Senior Civil Judge, Gannavaram.
2. Respondent, being the plaintiff filed suit O.S. No. 65 of 2016 on the file Senior Civil Judge, Gannavaram for cancellation of registered sale deed dated 07.03.2013 in respect of plaint schedule property which was obtained by defendants 1 to 4 by fraud, undue influence and misrepresentation without any consideration and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from interfering with plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and also for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 4 from alienating the plaint schedule property etc. Suit was renumbered as O.S. No. 207 of 2019 on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Senior Civil Judge, Gannavaram.
3........
Post-trial amendments to pleadings are generally not favored by courts and may be rejected if they are barred by limitation, would cause prejudice to the opposite party, change the nature of the suit....
A court can deny amendment requests under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC if due diligence is lacking after trial commencement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
