Back
B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Oriental Ins Comp Ltd. Z – Appellant
Versus
D. Fakrubee, Anantapuramu Dist – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This appeal is preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Anantapuramu, challenging the award dated 18.11.2015 passed in M.V.O.P.No.709/2012 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Addl.District Judge, Ananthapuramu, wherein the Tribunal while allowing the petition, awarded compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- with interest @ 7.5% P.A. from the date of petition, till the date of realisation to the respondents/claimants who are the parents, wife and children of the deceased Tadimarri Surya Prakash @ Suri,
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are arrayed as parties in the lower Court.
3. As seen from the record, the petitioners filed an application U/s.140, 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for brevity “the Act”) claiming compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- on account of the death of Tadimarri Surya Prakash @ Suri, who is husband of 1st petitioner, father of petitioners 2 and 3, and son of petitioners 4 and 5, in a road accident occurred on 20.07.2010 while the deceased was going on a motor cycle bearing No.AP 02 AE 3485 from Kotank to Anantapuramu.
4. The facts show that on 20.07.2010 at about 02.30 p.m. when the deceased Tadmimarri Surya Prakash @ Suri was
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation despite the violation of the insurance policy terms, and the application of the 'pay and....
A borrower of a vehicle is not considered a third party under the insurance policy, and the insurance company's liability is limited to the terms of the contract.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the insurance policy terms and the concept of a third party in the context of the deceased borrowing the motorcycle from the ....
Under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, claimants are not required to prove negligence; the onus lies on the insurer to establish any negligence to deny compensation.
A claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is maintainable if negligence cannot be attributed to the deceased rider, allowing for just compensation.
Legal heirs of the tort-feasor are not entitled to maintain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act against the insurer of the motorcycle.
The legal heirs of the deceased, as the tort-feasor, were not entitled to maintain the claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act against the appellant-Insurance Company.
Compensation claims under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act are not applicable when the deceased is the owner or a relative of the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident.
The court upheld the applicability of 'no-fault' liability provisions under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, confirming the Tribunal's compensation award without requiring proof of negligence....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
