R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
K. Veera Venkata Rajeswari, W/o. Syed Babji – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary – Respondent
ORDER :
The respondents 4 to 17 had claimed title and possession over various plots of land located in “MVN Layout” in Sy.No.275/D1 (Sy.No.275P) of Adavivaram Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. The entire land in the said survey number was claimed by the 3rd respondent-temple on the basis of the proceedings under the Inam Abolition Act as well as G.O.Ms.No.406, dated 20.06.2000. In view of long pending litigation, the Government had enquired into the matter and had come up with G.O.Ms.No.578 dated 19.08.2000 for regularisation of the ownership over the plots which were being claimed by both the 3rd respondent-Devasthanam as well as the persons in occupation of the said plots. This government order permitted the Devasthanam to regularise the ownership and possession of the persons over the lands, which were in their possession, on payment of consideration in accordance with the stipulations set out in the Government Order. (It appears that some of the respondents 4 to 17 were not the persons, in favour of whom land regularisation certificates were issued by the 3rd respondent, and they are claiming through the persons who had received such certificates. Thes
Nellore Bujjamma and Anr., vs. The Tahsildar, Rapur and Anr.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of obtaining permission from the Commissioner and necessary relaxation orders from the High Court for any exchange of immovable ....
Point of law: A person being a special Commissioner is not competent to discharge the duties of Commissioner of Endowments. Undisputedly, the Commissioner is working and the post of Commissioner is n....
An exchange deed executed by alleged trustees of a deity without proper authority is valid under current jurisdictional provisions; the High Court's review is limited to substantial questions of law ....
The court ruled that the land in Sy. No. 47 is private property of the applicants, not endowed to the temple, overturning the tribunal's decision.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.