E. V. Rama Rao vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(AP) 874

RAVI NATH TILHARI
E. V. Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P. Rajasekhar.
For the Respondents: G. Naresh Kumar, M. Manohara Reddy.

JUDGMENT :

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.

1. Heard Sri P. Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned GP for Municipal Administration, representing respondent No. 1 and Sri G. Naresh Kumar, representing Sri M. Manohara Reddy, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3.

2. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage without calling for counter affidavit.

3. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:

“.....to declare the Notice No. 85/1075/ELR//UC2021, dated 12.08.2022 issued by the 2nd respondent confirming the show cause notice dated 12.05.2021 and directed petitioner to bring the construction covered by D. No. 23B-5-2/1 situated in Edaravari Street, Revenue Ward No. 26, RR Peta, Eluru, West Godavari District into the rule frame within 7 days as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1995 and consequently command the respondents not to take any coercive steps of demolitions, in any manner, in the interests of justice and pass such other order or orders....”

4. Sri P. Rajasekha