IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
Dr. V. Krishna Murthy, S/o Kotaiah – Petitioner
Versus
The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Crl. Revision Case No.896 Of 2007
Decided On : 15-02-2023
Code of Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Sections 397,313 and 401 - Drugs and Customs Act, 1940 - Sections 21, 23 (5) , 27(d) , 18 (c) read with 27(d) and 18 (B) read with 28 (A) - Examination of accused - Illegal blood collection camp on the basis of complaint lodged - Complainant seized stocks under Form-16 in presence of mediators under cover of mediators report and obtained acknowledgment from A1. L.W.5-Dr. addressed a letter to the complainant stating that entire building was taken for rent and room where blood seized was given - A1 accepted that the stock belongs to him only and also accepted that he is not holding any license for said premises - Held, learned III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, imposed fine because penal provision is imprisonment or fine - It is a case where this Criminal Revision Case is pending since 2007. Looking into the age particulars of the accused furnished by complainant before the Court present accused must have been in the age group of 60. Here the learned III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate - ends of justice will meet, if imprisonment imposed against the petitioner for the charge under Section 18(c) r/w 27 (b)(ii) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Criminal Revision Case is allowed in part
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner, under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure Code (“Cr.P.C.” for short), who is the accused No.1 in C.C.No.496 of 2002, on the file of III-Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada and unsuccessful appellant in Criminal Appeal No.10 of 2006 on the file of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, challenging the judgment, dated 06.07.2007 in Criminal Appeal No.10 of 2006, where under the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge dismissed the Criminal Appeal confirming the judgment, dated 09.01.2006 in C.C.No.496 of 2002 on the file of III-Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.
2. The present Revision Petitioner faced trial before the trial Court for the contravention of the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act and he was convicted and sentenced. Challenging the same, he filed Criminal Appeal before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada and it was dismissed on merits. Hence, he filed the present Criminal Revision Case.
3. The parties to this Criminal Revision Case will hereinafter be referred as described before the Court below for the sake of convenience.
4. The case of the complainant before the Court below, in brief, is as follows:
(ii) On 27.03.2002, basing on the information regarding the storage of Blood at Sangha Mitra Clinic, situated at D.No.29- 19-831, Dornakal Road, Vijayawada by Dr.V.Krishna Murthy, the Complainant-L.W.1 along with Sub-Inspector of Police-L.W.2 and two mediators raided the premises of Sangha Mitra Clinic at 06:15 pm and they found 22 filled blood bags and 60 X 10 units blood collection bags (CPDA-I) in a room, situated at the right side of the entrance of Sangha Mitra Clinic. Then the complainant seized the above stocks under Form-16 in the presence of the mediators under the cover of mediators report and obtained acknowledgment from A1. L.W.5-Dr.Sudhakar addressed a letter to the complainant stating that the entire building was taken for rent and the room where the blood seized was given to Dr.V.Krishna Murthy, proprietor of M/s. Sivani Blood Bank. A1 accepted that the stock belongs to him only and also accepted that he is not holding any license for the said premises. He further stated that he is the proprietor of M/s. Sivani Blood Bank. Then the complainant has informed the seizure to the Court of V Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada on 28.03.2002, as required under Section 23 (5) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and as per the direction, the complainant produced the property along with the complaint. The Sub-Inspector of Police recorded the statements of professional donors and on 28.03.2002 that Dr.V. Krishna Murthy submitted certified copy of cash and credit memo, dated 24.03.2002 of M/s. Sri Devi Diagnostic Distributes, Miryalaguda issued to M/s.Sivani Blood Bank with regard to 600 blood bags. On verification, it was found that the above firm is not in existence at the given address. On the basis of news item published in Eenadu Telugu daily, dated 02.04.2002 regarding un-official collection of blood by Dr.V.Krishna Murthy along with some others at Huzurnagar, Nalogonda District, the complainant contacted Drugs Inspector and came to know that the Sub- Inspector of Police, Huzurnagar Police Station, Nalgonda District, arrested A-1 for the illegal blood collection camp on the basis of the complaint lodged by Uppala Sri Hari, President of Varthaka Sangam. Then the complainant addressed a letter to the Inspector General, Drugs Control Administration, Hyderabad, for the cancellation of license of M/s. Sivani Blood Bank and requested to pass necessary orders to launch prosecution against Dr.V.Krishna Murthy. The complainant also sent a letter to A1 to furnish the particulars of the mode of payment and
Possession of controlled drugs without proper licensing constitutes an offer for sale, leading to conviction under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.
The conviction under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act requires proof of sale or stocking of drugs without a valid license, and procedural compliance in investigations is crucial for upholding such convict....
Mere possession of a large quantity of medicines without a license does not raise a presumption of possession for sale. The prosecution must affirmatively prove that the accused manufactured the drug....
As per proviso to Section 27(b)(ii) of Act, for any adequate and special reasons to be recorded in judgment, Court may impose sentence of imprisonment for a term less than one year.
Conscious possession of narcotics is required for conviction under the NDPS Act; failure to comply with procedural safeguards can lead to acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.