SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 408

TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Nune Atchutha Ramayya – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T.V. JAGGI REDDY

ORDER :

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:-

    "To issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 4th respondent herein in mutating the name of the respondents no.5 to 12 in revenue records (Adangal, etc.) pertaining to the lands to an extent of Ac.23.90 cts, Ac.17.42 cts, Ac.3.07 cts, 6.64 cts, Ac.25.46 cts, 51.04 cts in S.No.210, 211, 212/1, 212/2, 213, 222 of Purushothapatnam Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District, contrary to the Civil Court decree in O.S.No.19/1988, dt.9-7-1991, is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, Contrary to the Provisions of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and the rules made there under and Arts. 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to delete the entries made in revenue records pertaining to the Survey number and extent stated supra and pass such other orders."

2. The present Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents, more particularly, the 4th respondent in mu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top