SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 51

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Ohnkali Nagabushanam – Appellant
Versus
Ayubkhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : KARRI MURALI KRISHNA
For the Respondent: A MALATHI

JUDGMENT :

1. Aggrieved by the order dated 09.01.2005 in M.V.O.P. No.168 of 2003 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Kadapa (for short “the tribunal”), the claimants preferred this appeal not being satisfied with the compensation awarded by the tribunal.

2. For convenience's sake, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as they were arrayed in the M.V.O.P.

3. It is a claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘M.V.Act’) claiming compensation an amount of Rs.15,00,000/-for the death of Ohankali Vidya Sagar, who is the son of claimants. The said Ohankali Vidyasagar will hereinafter be referred to as “the deceased”.

4. The claimant's case is that on 28.08.2002 at about 06.00 AM, the deceased, his wife and his daughter were travelling in an Ambassador car bearing No.AP-09-J-6426 belonging to respondent No.3, which is insured with respondent No.4 to attend to the marriage of their relative. When the said car was passing on the extreme left side of the road at Ramarajupalli on NH-7 road, suddenly a lorry bearing No.KA-03-A-5200 (hereinafter referred to as 'the offending vehicle') belonging to respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top