Back
B. S. BHANUMATHI
Westgodavari District Arya Vysya Sangham – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Arya Vysya Maha Sabha – Respondent
ORDER :
This revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred against the order, dated 01.04.2021, passed in I.A.No.292 of 2021 in O.P.No.75 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, West Godavari District, at Eluru, by adjourning the matter from 01.04.2021 to 19.04.2021, i.e., beyond the date of 11.04.2021 on which day the action sought to be injuncted was proposed to be held.
2. Heard Sri P.Radha Krishna, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri K.Chidambaram, learned senior counsel appearing for Sri A. Lalith Nikhil, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. Though 1st respondent is served with notice, there is no appearance on its behalf.
3. The facts, which lead to filing of the revision petition, briefly, are as follows:
Judicial orders must maintain consistency; once signed by a judge, an order cannot be rescinded without legitimate reasons, ensuring lawful procedural conduct in civil matters.
Where orders are passed condoning the delay, they are discretionary orders and ought not to be interfered with.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
