SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1237

VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Jakku Saraswathi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.Rajasekhar, Advocate, S.V.S.S.Siva Ram, Advocate, T.V.P.Sai Vihari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J. - Since the issue to be resolved in these three writ petitions and the parties to the proceedings are the same, I deem it appropriate to dispose of these three writ petitions by way of this common order.

2. For the sake of convenience and to avoid ambiguity in the discussion, the parties are referred to hereinafter as they are arrayed in W.P.No.13425 of 2022.

3. In brief, the facts are that the 1st petitioner and the 2nd petitioner are wife and husband. The 1st petitioner is the daughterin-law of one Smt. Jakku Atchayamma, who died on 10/3/2020. The 7th respondent is the authorized Fair Price Shop Dealer of Shop No.0315012, Jogampet Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. While so, the Assistant Supply Officer, Narsipatnam Division, had submitted a report to the 5th respondent against the 7th respondent, basing on the complaints given by the cardholders of the village that the 7th respondent has been drawing the rice of the deceased units and diverting the stock without the knowledge of cardholders and misusing the PDS commodities in violation of the Andhra Pradesh Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018 (for short 'th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top