SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 473

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Prashant Kumar Mishra, D.V.S.S. Somayajulu, JJ.
Merugu Manoj Babu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 13760 of 2020
Decided On : 28-02-2023

Advocates appeared:
A.Sreekanth Reddy, Advocate, V.Ramesh, Advocate, N.V.Sumanth, Advocate, M.Radha, Advocate, S.Harinath Reddy, Advocate

A person who does not possess the requisite qualification cannot challenge a recruitment notification.

Headnote:

PUBLIC HEALTH NURSES - PROMOTION - TUTOR - 100% RESERVATION FOR FEMALE NURSES - VALIDITY - ANDHRA PRADESH COLLEGE OF NURSING SERVICE RULES, 1997 - RULE 4 OF THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE AND SUBORDINATE SERVICE RULES, 1996 - ANDHRA PRADESH NURSING SERVICE RULES, 1965 - G.O.MS.NO.2035/HEALTH, HOUSING AND MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT DTD. 27/9/1965 - G.O.MS.NO.175, GAD (SERVICES) DTD. 27/11/2017 - ARTICLES 14 AND 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - WRIT PETITION - DISMISSED.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners, registered Public Health Nurses, challenged the G.O.Ms.No.101, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department dtd. 4/4/1997 - the Andhra Pradesh College of Nursing Service Rules - fixing 100% reservation for Female Nurses and filling up the posts of Professors, Assistant Professors, Lecturers and Tutors for Government Medical College without conducting any direct recruitment. They sought quashing of the consequential Notifications and a direction to fill up the posts through direct recruitment.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were not eligible for the post of Tutor as they lacked the essential qualification of B.Sc. (N)/M.Sc. (N)/ Post-B.Sc. (N) with two years experience in teaching line. It also noted that the petitioners had not challenged the constitutional validity of the Andhra Pradesh Nursing Service Rules, 1965, under which the post of Tutor was filled up.

Issues: 1. Whether the 100% reservation for Female Nurses in the Andhra Pradesh College of Nursing Service Rules, 1997, was valid. 2. Whether the petitioners were eligible for the post of Tutor.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a person who does not possess the requisite qualification cannot challenge a recruitment notification. It also held that the petitioners could not seek relief for declaration that the Notifications bearing G.O.Ms.No.74, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department, G.O.Ms.No.75, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department and G.O.Ms.No.76, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department, all dtd. 7/7/2020, were illegal and arbitrary without challenging the constitutional validity of the Andhra Pradesh Nursing Service Rules, 1965.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioners were not entitled to the post of Tutor/Nursing Tutor as they did not possess the requisite qualification and also in absence of challenge to the Andhra Pradesh Nursing Service Rules.

JUDGMENT

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J. - Petitioners, who are registered as Public Health Nurses, have preferred this writ petition seeking relief of quashment of G.O.Ms.No.101, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department dtd. 4/4/1997 - the Andhra Pradesh College of Nursing Service Rules - fixing 100% reservation for Female Nurses and filling up the posts of Professors, Assistant Professors, Lecturers and Tutors for Government Medical College without conducting any direct recruitment and the consequential Notifications, i.e. G.O.Ms.No.74, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department, G.O.Ms.No.75, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department and G.O.Ms.No.76, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department, all dtd. 7/7/2020, as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified, unconstitutional and contrary to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh dtd. 22/4/2020 in Civil Appeal No.3609 of 2022, seeking further direction to the respondentsauthorities to fill up the posts of Professors, Assistant Professors, Lecturers and Tutors in the Government Nursing College, through direct recruitment.

2. In the course of arguments, challenge was confined to filling up of the posts of Tutors only by 100% promotion from Staff Nurses as mentioned in G.O.Ms.No.74, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (E1) Department dtd. 7/7/2020.

3. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is stated the petitioner No.5 is eligible for the post of Tutor and petitioners 1 to 4 are eligible for the posts of Professor, Assistant Professor and Lecturers; however, respondents are filling up 193 vacancies through promotion only without conducting direct recruitment; thereby, not providing opportunity to the petitioners and depriving their right of employment.

4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that as per Rule 4 of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996, method of appointment to any service, class or category shall be by one or more of the methods indicated below as may be specified in the Special Rules applicable to the relevant post:- 1. Direct Recruitment 2. Recruitment / Appointment by transfer 3. Promotion or 4. Contract / Agreement / Re-employment, further providing that where the normal method of recruitment to any service, class or category includes direct recruitment, the proportion in which the special rules may require vacancies to be filled by persons recruited direct shall be applicable to all substantive vacancies and direct recruitment shall be made only against the substantive vacancies and that in respect of posts in the Subordinate Service, the percentage earmarked for direct recruitment should not fall short of 30%.

5. It is further contended that at the time of constituting Andhra Pradesh College of Nursing Service Rules, there was shortage of qualified Nurses due to which, most of the Kerala Nurses are working in Andhra Pradesh, but now due to availability of more avenues and opportunities, Male Nurses course was also introduced in the year 2005 by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and Male Nurses are also providing their services with great satisfaction; therefore, there is a necessity to change and amend the Andhra Pradesh College of Nursing Service Rules, to provide opportunity to Male Nurses. However, even today, the 1st respondent is following 100% reservation in favour of Female Nurses and that there is also a necessity to conduct direct recruitment for the posts of Professors, Assistant Professors, Lecturers and Tutors. It is argued that there is violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India by the respondents.

6. On behalf of the official respondents, the 2nd respondent, Director of Medical Education, has filed counter-affidavit submitting that the post of Tutor is a promotional post, feeder category of which is (i) appointment from the category of Head Nurse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top