JUDGMENT

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J. - Heard Sri K. A. Narasimham, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri A. V. S. Ramakrishna, learned counsel for all the respondents i.e., the Union Bank of India and its authorities, and perused the material available on record.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

"..... to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, by declaring the action of the respondents authorities in freezing my account bearing No.106611100000089 without any authority and illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentially direct the respondent authority to release my account bearing No.106611100000089 from the category of frozen account otherwise required to do so under statutory Law and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/East India Enterprises, Sector - I, Aganampudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam, represented by its Proprietor - Sri I. Sridhar operates the business with the financial assistance of respondent bank along with the Hongkong