SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 931

VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
G. V. Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in trying to dig the canal across the petitioner's land in Sy.No.60/10 of Unagatla Revenue Village, Chagallu Mandal, West Godavari District, without issuing any notice or initiating any proceedings either under land acquisition Act or under any other law as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner acquired agricultural land in an extent of Ac.4.78 cents inSy.No.60/10 of Unagatla Revenue Village, Chagallu Mandal, West Godavari District, by way of registered settlement deed bearing document Nos.1146/81, dtd. 8/4/1981 and 1731/83, dtd. 15/6/1983, executed by his sister. Since then he was in peaceful possession and enjoyment without any interference from whom so ever concerned. The revenue authorities have mutated the petitioner's name in the revenue records and issued pattadar pass book bearing patta No.130 dtd. 4/7/1996. On 11/12/2010, the respondent authorities came to land in Sy.No.60/10 for digging the canal across the petitioner's property as if the land was already acquired und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top