SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1127

NINALA JAYASURYA
Korada Subrahmanyam – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The present Criminal Petition is filed under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1972 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.78 of 2020 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent.

3. The petitioner is Accused No.2 in Crime No.179 of 2017 on the file of Tadepalli Police Station. After completion of investigation, a charge sheet was filed against him along with other accused for the offences punishable under Ss. 3, 4 and 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (ITP Act) alleging that when the Police raided a brothel house, the petitioner was present there as a customer and he visited the said premises to have sexual intercourse with a prostitute on payment of cash.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that prosecution for the offences under Ss. 3, 4 and 5 of ITP Act is not maintainable against a person, who visits the brothel house only as a customer. He further submits that the legal position as to whether a customer who visits a brothel house is liable for prosecution o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top