SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1008

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, J.
Soma Sudhakar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 18610, 18611, 15223 and 14856 of 2022
Decided On : 18-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Burlu Chandra Sekhar, Advocate, for the Appellant; GP, for the Respondents

The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the respondents to pay the principal amount of the bills raised by the petitioners within a specified time and the applicability of Memos to works executed under the 'Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme'.

Headnote:

Court Order - Memo No. 1263069/RD.II/A1/2020 - Legal provision discussed by the court is the applicability of Memos issued for works executed under 'Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme'. The court directed the respondents to pay the principal amount of the bills raised by the writ petitioners within a specified time and clarified the applicability of the Memos to the works executed under the scheme.

Fact of the Case:

The court heard the counsel for the petitioners and respondents regarding the issue raised in the writ petitions, which was covered by a previous court order. The court also considered the interim orders passed in related writ appeals.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the respondents to pay the principal amount of the bills raised by the petitioners within a specified time, failing which the petitioners would be entitled to interest. The court also clarified the applicability of the Memos to works executed under the scheme.

Issues: The issue raised in the writ petitions, the applicability of Memos to works executed under the 'Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme', and the payment of bills by the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the applicability of the Memos to works executed under the scheme and the obligation of the respondents to pay the principal amount of the bills raised by the petitioners within a specified time.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to pay the principal amount of the bills raised by the petitioners within six weeks, failing which the petitioners would be entitled to interest at 12% per annum. There was no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondents in all the writ petitions and perused the material available on record.

2. The issue raised in these writ petitions is squarely covered by the order of this Court in Rayapureddy Srinivasa Rao and others vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government and others and batch, (W.P. No. 10038 of 2021 and batch) in which the writ petitions were allowed with the following directions:

    i) The Memo No. 1263069/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 05.11.2020 and the Memo No. 1388361/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 12.05.2021 issued by the Respondent No. 1 are set aside to the extent of deduction of 21.02% for DCC works and 6.333% for MCC works while making payment to the petitioner.

    ii) The respondents are directed to clear the bills submitted by the petitioner and to release payment forthwith, in case no payment is made till date.

    iii) In case, any part payment is made as on date, the remaining amount shall be paid to the petitioner forthwith.

    iv) The respondents shall pay interest @ 12% per annum within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

    v) The interest shall be computed from the date of expiry of one month from the date of submission of the bill by the petitioner to till the date of final payment.

    3. Against the above said order, several writ appeals are filed and in one of the writ appeals (i.e.) W.A. No. 724 of 2021, a Division Bench of this Court has passed an interim order, dated 18.11.2021 as extracted hereunder:

      'The direction of the learned Single Judge regarding payment of interest to the respondent No. 1 as also setting aside the provision in Memo No. 1263069/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 05.11.2020 and the Memo No. 1388361/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 12.05.2021 relating to deduction of 21.02% for DCC works and 6.333% for MCC works, while making payment, shall remained stayed.

      On a query of the Court, learned Advocate General submitted that the direction of the learned Single Judge as far as payment of the principal amount of the bills raised by the original writ petitioner, in terms of the order of the Division Bench in Krishna District Grama Panchayathi Sarpanchla Sangam (supra), shall be made within four weeks, if already not done.

      The matter be listed for hearing in due course.

      It is clarified that the appellants shall comply with the rest of the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the judgment under appeal.'

      4. Subsequently, a Division Bench of this Court headed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice while hearing the Writ Appeal Nos. 740 and 741 of 2021, having considered the order passed in W.A. No. 724 of 2021, the following order is passed:

        'Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the interim order passed by the Coordinate Bench, we direct that the said interim order shall apply for the present writ appeals also, however, with a condition that the appellants shall pay the principal amount of the bill raised by the original writ petitioners, within a period of four weeks, failing which the present interim order shall stand vacated without reference to the bench.'

        5. The respective counsels appearing for the petitioners and the respondents have consented to dispose of the writ petitions by following the order, dated 24.11.2021, passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A. Nos. 740 and 741 of 2021.

        6. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the Court to clarify the applicability of the Memo No. 1263069/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 05.11.2020 and the Memo No. 1388361/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 12.05.2021.

        7. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj submitted that the said Memos are issued for the works executed under 'Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme'.

        8. It is made clear that the Memo No. 1263069/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 05.11.2020 and the Memo No. 1388361/RD.II/A1/2020, dated 12.05.2021 are applicable t

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top