ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Subba Reddy Satti, J.
T. Chandrika – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 4251 of 2022
Decided On : 07-07-2022
CRIMINAL LAW - ANTICIPATORY BAIL - SECTION 438 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - ABETMENT OF SUICIDE - SECTION 306 OF IPC - INGREDIENTS - MERE ALLEGATION OF ABETMENT TO HARASS WILL NOT SUFFICE TO ATTRACT INGREDIENTS OF SECTION 306 OF IPC.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, accused in a case of abetment of suicide, filed a petition for pre-arrest bail. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, harassed the deceased for additional dowry, leading her to commit suicide. The petitioner denied any instigation or abetment on his part.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the complaint did not indicate any abetment or instigation on the part of the petitioner. The court also noted that mere allegations of harassment of the deceased by another person would not be sufficient to constitute an offence under Section 306 of IPC, unless there are allegations of such actions on the part of the accused which compelled the commission of suicide.
Issues: Whether the petitioner abetted the deceased to commit suicide.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Geo Varghese v. State of Rajasthan and Another, which held that mere allegations of harassment of the deceased by another person would not be sufficient to constitute an offence under Section 306 of IPC, unless there are allegations of such actions on the part of the accused which compelled the commission of suicide.
Final Decision: The court granted pre-arrest bail to the petitioner on the condition that he cooperate with the investigation, not influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, and appear before the Station House Officer once a week.
JUDGMENT
Subba Reddy Satti, J. - The petitioner, who is Accused in Crime No. 193 of 2022 of Tiruchanur Police Station, Tirupathi Urban, filed this Criminal Petition under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that A1 married the deceased 10 year back and since then she was mentally and physically harassed by the accused for additional dowry. A2 - father-in-law and A3 -mother-in-law of the deceased also harassed her for additional dowry. Deceased lodged complaint initially at Venkatagiri Police Station and on such complaint A1/husband of the deceased was sent to remand. Later the issue was pacified through elders and A1 and deceased continued their marital life by living separately from A2 and A3. Subsequently, also A1 by showing obscene videos on cell phone harassed her and also demanded additional dowry with the support of A2 and A3. Due to unbearable harassment, deceased called her mother and informed that she is not able to bear the torture of her husband and ended the call. Deceased's brother contacted neighbours of deceased's house and asked them to observe. When they went there, she hanged herself to fan. On receiving the said information they rushed to the place and then A1 informed to them that though deceased was taken to hospital, doctors said she was brought dead. On a compliant given by the mother of the deceased, Police registered Crime No. 193 of 2022 of Tiruchanur Police Station for the offence under Sections 306, 498-A r/w 34 IPC and under Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Heard Sri D. Purna Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit marriage of the deceased with A1 took place about 10 years back and they were blessed with two children. He submits that there is no instigation or abetment on the part of the petitioner, which lead the victim to take extreme step of committing suicide. He submits that, going by the complaint, A1 harassed the deceased mentally and physically and the averments of the complaint do not indicate any instigation on abetment on the part of the petitioner. He submits that mere allegation of the deceased that the petitioner abetted A1 to harass her does not constitute an offence under Section 306 of IPC, unless such actions compelled the victim to commit suicide. In support of his contention, he placed reliance on Geo Varghese v. State of Rajasthan and Another. Hence, prayed for grant of pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed the application on the ground that there are serious accusations of abetment against the petitioner herein and prayed for dismissal of the Criminal Petition.
6. I have perused the entire record and anxious consideration is given to the material therein and to the contentions of the both the counsel.
7. A perusal of the complaint does not indicate abetment or instigation on the part of the petitioner. In view of the same this Court is inclined to consider the case of the petitioner for pre-arrest bail.
In Geo Varghese v. State of Rajasthan and Another's case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under:
'23. What is required to constitute an alleged abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC is there must be an allegation of either direct or indirect act of incitement to the commission of offence of suicide and mere allegations of harassment of the deceased by another person would not be sufficient in itself, unless, there are allegations of such actions on the part of the accused which compelled the commission of suicide. Further, if the person committing suicide is hypersensitive and the allegations attributed to the accused is otherwise not ordinarily expected to induce a similarly situated person to take the extreme step of committing suicide, it would be unsafe to hold the accused guilty of abetment of suicide. Thus, what is required is an examinati
Mere allegation of abetment to harass will not suffice to attract ingredients of Section 306 of IPC.
The necessary ingredients contemplated under Section 107 of IPC regarding intentional instigation or aid given by the accused to the deceased are to be established during the course of investigation.
In cases of alleged harassment leading to suicide, the intentional instigation or intentional aid given by the accused to the deceased to commit suicide must be established to constitute an offence u....
The requirement to establish abetment for the offence under Section 306 IPC and the lack of specific allegations against the accused influenced the court's decision to grant pre-arrest bail.
The necessity of active instigation or aiding in committing suicide, mens rea, and a direct act intended to push the deceased into committing suicide for conviction under Section 306 IPC.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.