SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1311

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J.
Arun Kumar Mahipal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 2436 of 2022
Decided On : 13-04-2022

Granting bail based on completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet, while also considering the apprehension of the petitioner absconding due to residency in another state.

Headnote:

Bail - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Enlargement of petitioner on bail with conditions

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested for illegally transporting ganja and had been in jail for over 240 days. The prosecution completed the investigation and filed a charge sheet, leading to the petitioner's bail petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's further incarceration was not warranted, but due to the apprehension that the petitioner might abscond, bail was granted with certain conditions.

Issues: Enlargement of petitioner on bail, apprehension of absconding

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet as grounds for granting bail, but also took into account the apprehension of the petitioner absconding due to his residency in another state.

Final Decision: The criminal petition was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be enlarged on bail with specific conditions to ensure his presence during the trial.

ORDER

1. This criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No. 192 of 2021 of Special Enforcement Bureau Station, V.Madugula, Visakhapatnam District.

3. A case under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS' Act) was registered against the petitioner in the above crime.

4. As per the prosecution case, on 29.07.2021, when the petitioner was illegally transporting about 55 KGs of ganja in a car that he was apprehended by the police and the contraband was seized from his possession. Therefore, it is stated that the petitioner has committed the aforesaid offence.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

6. The petitioner was arrested on 29.07.2021 and since then he has been languishing in jail for the last more than 240 days period of time. As per the submission made by learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the entire investigation in this case is completed and charge sheet was also filed. Therefore, in the said facts and circumstances of the case, his further incarceration is not warranted. So, he is entitled to bail. However, in view of the apprehension expressed by learned Additional Public Prosecutor that as the petitioner is resident of Uttarpradesh State that he may abscond if he is released on bail and it would be difficult for the police to nab him to secure his presence for trial, he is entitled to bail on certain conditions.

7. Resultantly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on execution of self bond for Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) with two sureties who shall be the solvent sureties and local sureties and they shall be the permanent residents of Visakhapatnam District, for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, V.Madugula, Visakhapatnam. On his release, the petitioner shall report before the Station House Officer, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, V.Madugula, Visakhapatnam once in a month on the 2nd day of every succeeding month till the trial of the case is concluded and the case is disposed of in the trial Court. The aforesaid conditions are imposed to ensure the presence of the petitioner during the course of trial and in view of the apprehension expressed by learned Additional Public Prosecutor as discussed supra. The petitioner shall scrupulously comply with the above conditions and any infraction of the same will be viewed very seriously and it also entails cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top