SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 594

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU
Dwarapudi Sivarama Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J. - In this batch of writ petitions, petitioners challenge the constitutional validity of the impugned notifications, i.e. notification No.318/FSSAMP/2014-20, dtd. 8/1/2020, published on 10/1/2020, and notification No.318/FSSA/AP/2014-21 dtd. 6/12/2021, issued by the Commissioner of Food Safety, by invoking Sec. 30(2)(a) of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 (for short, "the FSSA, 2006") thereby prohibiting the manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation and sale of Gutka/Pan Masala which contains Tobacco and Nicotine as ingredients and chewing tobacco products etc., within the meaning of Ss. 3(m) and 3(p) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (for short, "the COTPA, 2003"); as such, the writ petitions are heard together and disposed of by this common order.

2. Challenge to the notification is mainly on the ground that the Central Government is levying and collecting excise duty on the production of Tobacco products under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and that Tobacco and Tobacco related products are regulated under the C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top