SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 502

RAVI NATH TILHARI
Shaik Mohammad Shoaib – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Challa Sivasankar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravi Nath Tilhari, J. - Heard Sri Challa Sivasankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Siva Darshan, learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3.

2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:

    'This Hon?ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in interfering/obstructing in using the existing road from Pudicherla Village Map in Sy. No.405 to reach petitioner patta land in Sy.No.405 an extent of Ac.4.39 cents situated in Pudicherla Village fields Orvakal Mandal, Kurnool District in spite of recommendation of 6th respondent by Lr.Rc.A/ /2018 dated 05.12.2018 which is illegal arbitrary unjust violative of principles of Natural Justice Articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to use road which is earmarked for road in Pudicherla Village Map existing in Sy.No.405 of Pudicherla to reach subject land or otherwise petitioner and his family will suffer serious finance loss and great hardship and pass appropriate orders'.

    3

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top