IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V. SUJATHA, J.
A. Seshadri Naidu - Petitioner
Versus
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation - Respondent
I.A. No. 1 of 2020 in W.P. No. 6045 of 2013
Decided On : 07-07-2023
Review Petition - Civil Procedure Code - Section 114 - 14, 17, 27 of the Record of Discussions dated 24.05.1977, G.O.Ms.No.1037 Revenue-Endowments–III Department dated 13.08.1979 - The court discussed the specific assurance given by the APSRTC to the transferred employees regarding retirement benefits and pension, the G.O.Ms.No.1037 extending pensionary benefits to TTD workers, and the letter dated 25.03.1988 permitting the revocation of option. The court held that the transferred employees were entitled to pension on par with TTD employees and family pension for spouses of the employees from the date of submission of their respective applications seeking such benefit.
Fact of the Case:
The review petition was filed under Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code by the respondents in writ petition No.6045 of 2013 to review the order dated 24.11.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad. The petitioners, former employees of TTD whose services were transferred to APSRTC, sought pension benefits admissible to TTD employees.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the transferred employees were entitled to pension on par with TTD employees and family pension for spouses of the employees from the date of submission of their respective applications seeking such benefit.
Issues: The main issue was whether the transferred employees were entitled to pension benefits admissible to TTD employees despite opting for APSRTC regulations and enjoying benefits such as promotions and higher pay scales.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the specific assurance given by APSRTC to the transferred employees regarding retirement benefits and pension, the G.O.Ms.No.1037 extending pensionary benefits to TTD workers, and the letter dated 25.03.1988 permitting the revocation of option supported the entitlement of the transferred employees to pension on par with TTD employees.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the review petition, affirming the entitlement of the transferred employees to pension on par with TTD employees and family pension for spouses of the employees from the date of submission of their respective applications seeking such benefit.
ORDER :
1. This review petition is filed under Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code by the respondents in writ petition No.6045 of 2013 to review the order dated 24.11.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad in W.P.No.6045 of 2013, which was decided along with other W.P.Nos.8315, 8534, 8538 and 39284 of 2014 and 4561 of 2015 by a common order. Against the common order passed in W.P.No.6045 of 2013 and batch, respondents therein preferred W.A.No.1144 of 2017 and batch, which were closed granting liberty to the respondents to file review applications before the learned single Judge.
2. The petitioner was formerly employed as Store Keeper in the Transport Wing of Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams (for short "TTD"). This Transport Wing of the TTD was taken over by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short "APSRTC") with effect from 10.08.1975 and the services of the petitioner were placed at the disposal of APSRTC. At that time, there was an agreement dated 08.08.1975 between the APSRTC and the TTD with regard to transfer of the TTD Transport Department to the APSRTC. Clause 14 of the said agreement is relevant and the same is referred to as under :
(a) In case of Provident Fund, the amount outstanding to the credit of the transferred employees will be made over to the APSRTC by the Devasthanam.
(b) The liability on account of Gratuity payable to the retiring employee will be proportionately born by the Devasthanam for the period of service rendered to them.”
3. Thereafter, there were discussions held by the Director of Personnel of the APSRTC and the representative of the TTD Transport Workers' Union, of which petitioners were members, regarding the service conditions of persons like the petitioner whose services were transferred from the Transport Wing of the TTD to the APSRTC. Clause 14 of the record of discussions dated 24/25.5.1977 between the parties, which is relevant is extracted hereunder :
The issue has been covered under minute No.6. The same conditions shall apply to those who were given promotions in TT Units. The DOP informed that there is no bar for any of the transferred employees to aspire for promotion if they accept to come under APSRTC Regulations. Such promotions will be given subject to the vacancies existed on the date of exercising option. The DOP further informed that the Corporation will guarantee retirement benefits admissible under TTD Service Rules to such of the employees who opt to the governed by the APSRTC Regulations and such employees will not be deprived of the retirement benefits of pension.”
4. The employees of the TTD were getting the benefit of the Andhra Pradesh Liberalized Pension Rules, 1961 (for short "the 1961 Rules"). But Transport and Canteen workers, who were originally employed in TTD and whose services were transferred to the APSRTC were not having any pension rules as such they raised a question about their entitlement to pension under the 1961 Rules.
5. The State Government issued G.O.Ms.No.1037 Revenue- Endowments-III Department dated 13.08.1979 stating that as per the agreement dated 08.08.1975 between the TTD and the APSRTC at the time of handing over the Transport Wing of the TTD to the APSRTC, all benefits to which the TTD staff were entitled to prior to transfer of this Wing to the APSRTC will have to be continued by the APSRTC. Government stated that the benefits under the Liberalized Pension Scheme will have to be extended to this category also along with residuary employees of the Transport Wing with TTD and consequently the TTD would have to make proportionate pensionary contribution to the APSRTC in respect of those employees transferred to it. It further stated that all TTD Transport Workers would be extended the pensionary benefits under the 1961 Rules and the
Allahabad Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat
State of West Bengal and Others Vs. Kamal Sengupta and another
The transferred employees were entitled to pension on par with TTD employees based on the specific assurances given by APSRTC and the government order extending pensionary benefits to TTD workers.
Denial of pension to employees of aided institutions appointed prior to promulgation of Rajasthan Civil Services (Contributory) Pension Rules, 2005 at par with Government servants as per Pension Rule....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.