Back
V. GOPALA KRIS
Katakam Gopala Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. Hari prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The appellant is the Claimant in M.V.O.P.No.676 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum- Principal District Judge, Guntur and the respondents are the respondents in the said case.
2. For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim application.
3. The claimant filed a Claim Petition under sections 149 and 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the respondents praying the Tribunal to award an amount of Rs.75,000/- towards compensation for the injuries sustained by him in a Motor Vehicle Accident occurred on 21.02.2003.
4. The brief averments of the petition are as follows:
On 21.02.2003 at about 11.30 p.m. when the petitioner was going on a bicycle along with one Home Guard by name Bhiksha Rao near R & B Bungalow at over bridge of Mangalagiri, the rider of Bajaj Boxer motor cycle bearing No.AP7N 5277 rode the same in a rash and negligent manner with high speed and hit against the bicycle, resulting which the petitioner and the pillion rider Bhiksha Rao sustained grievous injuries and the petitioner claimed an amount of Rs.75,000/- towards compensation.
5. The first respondent remained expa
The delay in lodging the First Information Report cannot be a ground to doubt the case of the claimant.
The burden of proof on the claimant to establish injuries sustained in a road accident, the standard of proof required, and the liability of the insurance company in case of negligence by the driver ....
The presumption of guilt of the driver of the offending vehicle if a charge sheet is filed after investigation, and the shift of burden of proof to the appellant to prove the claimant's negligence.
The court ruled that the evidence of negligence established sufficient grounds for compensation, holding the driver of the offending vehicle primarily responsible for the accident despite any contrib....
The claimant must establish the occurrence of an accident with corroborative evidence; reliance solely on witness testimony without supporting documentation is insufficient for compensation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
